Difference between revisions of "STAC Amyas"

From Waalt
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
''' Amyas, Thomas '''
 
''' Amyas, Thomas '''
*STAC 5/A16 /26 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Thomas Amyas v Robert Walter, Robert Pitts et al
+
*STAC 5/A16/26 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Thomas Amyas v Robert Walter, Robert Pitts et al
*STAC 10/1/117 - Rn - - Nottinghamshire - Amyas v Waltern, Pitts  
+
*STAC 10/1/117 - Rn - - - Amyas v Waltern, Pitts  
**[[STAC co Nottingham]]]
 
  
 
''' Amyas, Thomas '''
 
''' Amyas, Thomas '''
Line 18: Line 17:
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 +
*STAC 5/A16/26 - Possiblty Purjury, possibly Norfolk (not Notts,) possibly spreading infamy and discredit, possibly a certificate of inability to travel.
 +
*STAC 10/1/117 - TNA note: Replication of Thomas Amyas, genteman TNA says Nottinghamshire

Latest revision as of 13:50, 28 October 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Amyas, Robert

  • STAC 5/A58/31 - B - - - Robert Amyas v Jerome Songer, John Gyll et al

Amyas, Roger

  • STAC 5/A58/14 - A - - - Roger Amyas v Jerome Songar

Amyas, Thomas

  • STAC 5/A16/26 - B Dr - 26 Eliz - Thomas Amyas v Robert Walter, Robert Pitts et al
  • STAC 10/1/117 - Rn - - - Amyas v Waltern, Pitts

Amyas, Thomas

  • STAC 5/A59/19 - B - 35 Eliz - - Thomas Amyas v Henry Howlett, John Longe

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/A16/26 - Possiblty Purjury, possibly Norfolk (not Notts,) possibly spreading infamy and discredit, possibly a certificate of inability to travel.
  • STAC 10/1/117 - TNA note: Replication of Thomas Amyas, genteman TNA says Nottinghamshire