Difference between revisions of "Legal Profession"
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
'''1278:''' | '''1278:''' | ||
− | '''M1278 A:''' Norfolk. Hamon de la Grene vs Reginald de Clackclose. Defendant says Adam Spitheleschanke brought 3 false royal writs to William Giffard as sheriff of Norfolk with whom Reginald was then clerk.Perceived falsity. Adam took refuge in church and acknowledged falsity [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no27/aCP40no27fronts/IMG_9165.htm] PAB | + | '''M1278 A:''' Norfolk. Hamon de la Grene vs Reginald de Clackclose. Defendant says Adam Spitheleschanke brought 3 false royal writs to William Giffard as sheriff of Norfolk with whom Reginald was then clerk. Perceived falsity. Adam took refuge in church and acknowledged falsity was made by Hamon. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no27/aCP40no27fronts/IMG_9165.htm] PAB; for the appointment of Hamon de la Grene of Hanworth as attorney in an unrelated case see [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no27/aCP40no27fronts/IMG_9500.htm] PAB; for a plaint against Hamon for trespass in Norfolk see [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no27/bCP40no27dorses/IMG_9791.htm] PAB |
+ | |||
'''1279:''' | '''1279:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''H1279 A:''' Norfolk.Mainprise for Simon de Clay who offered imself as attorney of Mary, widow of Robert de Thyme of Fodon and put himself on record of the rolls but could not be found [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no28/bCP40no28frontsPt2/IMG_0133.htm] PAB | ||
'''1280:''' | '''1280:''' | ||
Line 136: | Line 139: | ||
'''1286:''' | '''1286:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''1286 Norfolk Eyre:''' presentment by county knights: Simon de Cleye adhered to other party and so lost land for his client Fulcher de Surr' by default, trial by jury - Simon was sent to gaol [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/JUST1/JUST1no579/bJUST1no579dorses] PAB | ||
+ | |||
'''1287:''' | '''1287:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''E1287 A:''' Lincoln. Matthew le Crestyen, attorney of HUgh le Taillur, defaulted wrongly to favour of adverse party (William le Latimer and Alice his wife and Christine, widow of John le Latimer. Earl of Lincoln, who had given the wardship to Hugh, gets writ to investigate [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no67/bCP40no67dorses/IMG_4030.htm] PAB | ||
'''1288:''' | '''1288:''' | ||
Line 144: | Line 152: | ||
'''1290:''' | '''1290:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''E1290 A:''' London. Case transferred from London hustings into Bench: Complaint that defendant's attorney had arrainged with the essoiner William of Pocklington to essoin defendant but he had then failed to do so. The essoiner goes to gaol. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no82/bCP40no82dorses/IMG_3690.htm] PAB | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''M1290A:''' Worcestershire. Mandate from King to JJ to inquire into misbehaviour of Edmund of Littleton who undertook to prosecute and defend a case for 10 marks and had revealed counsel and the basis of the defence to client's opponents [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no86/aCP40no86fronts/IMG_0253.htm] PAB | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''M1290B:''' Warwickshire. Master John of Colby sued litigation for clients after the case had gone sine die by nonsuit. Master John committed to gaol. [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/E1/CP40no86/aCP40no86fronts/IMG_0475.htm] PAB | ||
+ | |||
'''1291:''' | '''1291:''' |
Latest revision as of 16:22, 7 March 2018
This page is for links to material revealing about the legal professions, from relations with clients, to legal fees, to illegal conduct. The following abbreviations for scholars responsible for entries are used: RCP or no signature = Robert Palmer: SJ or SB = Susanne Brand; PAB = Paul Brand 1224: 1225: 1226: 1227: 1228: 1229: 1230: 1231: 1232: 1233: 1234: 1235: 1236: 1237: 1238: 1239: 1240: 1241: 1242: 1243: 1244: 1245: 1246: 1247: 1248: 1249: 1250: 1251: 1252: 6 July 1252: pardon to Geoffrey Daniell. Withdrew himself for fear of Humphrey de Bohun who charged that he had misled (seduxit) him when he was his attorney against Walter de Baskerville before JJ of Bench [CPR 1247-58, p. 144] PAB 1253: 1254: 1255: 1256: T1256:A Possible deception by attorney [KB26/142, m. 12] PAB 1257: 1258: 1259: 1260: 1261: 1262: 1263: 1264: 1265: 1266: 1267: 1268: 1269: 1270: 1271: 1272: 1273: 1274: 1275: H1275 A:: Derby. Robert de Crey, co. Derby, was appointed attorney by Margery widow of Alexander Luterel before JJ of Bench for seeking dower but obtaining of dower took longer than it ought by his default. He agrees that she have lands of his to the value of the third being sought to keep until at his own cost and by his suit he obtains her dower. Entry shows that he is a neighbour and not a professional lawyer. [1] PAB 1276: 1277: 1278: M1278 A: Norfolk. Hamon de la Grene vs Reginald de Clackclose. Defendant says Adam Spitheleschanke brought 3 false royal writs to William Giffard as sheriff of Norfolk with whom Reginald was then clerk. Perceived falsity. Adam took refuge in church and acknowledged falsity was made by Hamon. [2] PAB; for the appointment of Hamon de la Grene of Hanworth as attorney in an unrelated case see [3] PAB; for a plaint against Hamon for trespass in Norfolk see [4] PAB 1279: H1279 A: Norfolk.Mainprise for Simon de Clay who offered imself as attorney of Mary, widow of Robert de Thyme of Fodon and put himself on record of the rolls but could not be found [5] PAB 1280: 1281: 1282: 1283: 1284: 1285: 1286: 1286 Norfolk Eyre: presentment by county knights: Simon de Cleye adhered to other party and so lost land for his client Fulcher de Surr' by default, trial by jury - Simon was sent to gaol [6] PAB
E1287 A: Lincoln. Matthew le Crestyen, attorney of HUgh le Taillur, defaulted wrongly to favour of adverse party (William le Latimer and Alice his wife and Christine, widow of John le Latimer. Earl of Lincoln, who had given the wardship to Hugh, gets writ to investigate [7] PAB 1288: 1289: 1290: E1290 A: London. Case transferred from London hustings into Bench: Complaint that defendant's attorney had arrainged with the essoiner William of Pocklington to essoin defendant but he had then failed to do so. The essoiner goes to gaol. [8] PAB M1290A: Worcestershire. Mandate from King to JJ to inquire into misbehaviour of Edmund of Littleton who undertook to prosecute and defend a case for 10 marks and had revealed counsel and the basis of the defence to client's opponents [9] PAB M1290B: Warwickshire. Master John of Colby sued litigation for clients after the case had gone sine die by nonsuit. Master John committed to gaol. [10] PAB
1292: 1293: 1294: 1295: 1296: E1297 A: Adam de Duyn vs Robert Waundard, parson of the church of Shoteswell, in a plea that he forcibly seized and abducted Amice, wife of the said Adam, in the parish of St Mary de la Stronde outside the bar of the New Temple London (vi et armis). [11] 1298: 1299: |
1300: 1301: 1302: 1303: 1304: 1305: 1306: 1307: 1308: T1308 A: misconduct of Geoffrey de Clyff, attorney in suit Henry de Herdyngton v Henry Rete of Erdynges [12] SJ 1309: 1310: 1311: 1312: 1313: 1314: T1314 A: Attorney without proof of warrant sent to Marshalsea prison [13] SJ 1315: 1316: 1317: 1318: 1319: 1320: 1321: 1322: 1323: 1324: 1325: 1326: 1327: 1328: 1329: 1330: 1331: 1332: 1333: 1334: 1335: 1336: 1337: 1338: 1339: 1340: 1341: 1342:
1343: 1344: 1345:
1346: 1347: 1348: H1348A: Assault in hall of pleas in Somerton in 18 Edward III before justices. [16], [17] rcp M1348 A: Yorkshire. Rex v. Master Robert de Newenham procurator in the court Christian in the church of St Peter, York. Newehnam was found to be a common ambidexter; he took 10s for his fees. [18] M1348 B: Yorkshire. Rex v. John de Barneburgh found guilty of champerty as attorney in cases arising in Donaster in 18 Edward III. [19] H1349 A: Yorkshire. Presented that Hugh Boldbody de Kerhous was an ambidexter in pleas: he was of counsel of Olive Proctur of North Duffield in her widowhood in a bill prosecuted coram rege in the time of William Scot against John son of Hugh of North Duffield; he took from Olive his salary and from John 40d. He was a common ambidexter in many pleas. He was of counsel to William Haukesworth de Blactofte to prosecute for him divers bills against Adam Toy de Salby and against Alice Bore de Esterington, but he prosecuted those bills to have a part, so that by arbitration and the consideration of neighbors chosen between them Haukesworth was supposed to have two marks of silver for the wrongs done by Adam and Alice, of which William Haukesworth got only 5s and Boldbody got the rest, which he took at champerty. And he is a common maintainer of pleas. He made fine. [20] H1349 B: Yorkshire. Presented that John de Slengesby took from the lady of Molton 13s4d to aid her on a jury of formedon between her and Elena Vendour, but then took 20s from Elena to hold with her in the same plea. [21] 1349: 1350: 1351: 1352: 1353: 1354: 1355: 1356: 1357: 1358: 1359: 1360: 1361:
1362: 1363: 1364: 1365: 1366: 1367: 1368: 1369: 1370: 1371: 1372: 1373: 1374: 1375: 1376: 1377: 1378: 1379: 1380: 1381: 1382: 1383: 1384: 1385: 1386: 1387: 1388: 1389: 1390: 1391: 1392: 1393: 1394: 1395: 1396: 1397: 1398: 1399: |
1400: 1401: 1402: 1403: 1404: 1405: 1406: 1407: 1408: 1409: 1410: 1411: 1412: 1413: 1414: 1415: 1416: 1417: 1418: 1419: 1420: 1421: 1422: 1423: 1424: 1425: 1426: 1427: 1428: 1429: 1430: 1431: 1432: 1433: 1434: 1435:
1436: 1437: 1438: 1439: 1440: 1441: 1442: 1443: 1444: 1445: 1446: 1447: 1448: 1449: 1450: 1451: 1452: 1453: 1454: 1455: 1456: 1457: 1458: 1459: 1460: 1461: 1462: 1463: 1464: 1465:
1466: 1467: 1468: 1469: 1470: 1471: 1472: 1473: 1474: 1475: 1476: 1477: 1478: 1479: 1480: 1481: 1482: 1483: 1484: 1485: 1486: 1487: 1488: 1489: 1490: 1491: 1492: 1493: 1494: 1495: 1496: 1497: 1498: 1499: |
1500: 1501: 1502: 1503: 1504: 1505: 1506: 1507: 1508: 1509: 1510: 1511: 1512: 1513: 1514: 1515: 1516: 1517: 1518: 1519: 1520: 1521: 1522: 1523: 1524: 1525: 1526: 1527: 1528: 1529: 1530:
1531: 1532: 1533: 1534: 1535: 1536: 1537: 1538: 1539: 1540: 1541: 1542: 1543: 1544: 1545: 1546: 1547: 1548: 1549: 1550: 1551: 1552: 1553: 1554: 1555: 1556: 1557: 1558: 1559: 1560: 1561: 1562: 1563: 1564: 1565: 1566: 1567: 1568: 1569: 1570: 1571: 1572: 1573: 1574: 1575: 1576: 1577: 1578: 1579: 1580: 1581: 1582: 1583: 1584: 1585: 1586: 1587: 1588: 1589: 1590:
1591: 1592: 1593: 1594: 1595: 1596: 1597: 1598: 1599: |
1600: 1601: 1602: 1603: 1604: 1605: 1606: 1607: 1608: 1609: 1610: 1611: 1612: 1613: 1614: 1615: 1616: 1617: 1618: 1619: 1620: 1621: 1622: 1623: 1624: 1625: 1626: 1627: 1628: 1629: 1630: 1631: 1632: 1633: 1634: 1635: 1636: 1637: 1638: 1639: 1640: 1641: 1642: 1643: 1644: 1645: 1646: 1647: 1648: 1649: 1650: 1651: 1652: 1653: 1654: 1655: 1656: 1657: 1658: 1659: 1660: 1661: 1662: 1663: 1664: 1665: 1666: 1667: 1668: 1669: 1670: 1671: 1672: 1673: 1674: 1675: 1676: 1677: 1678: 1679: 1680: 1681: 1682: 1683: 1684: 1685: 1686: 1687: 1688: 1689: 1690: 1691: 1692: 1693: 1694: 1695: 1696: 1697: 1698: 1699: |