Difference between revisions of "C78 1844"
From Waalt
m |
m |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
| | | | ||
| Richard Bottomley Nowell v. George Whitaker | | Richard Bottomley Nowell v. George Whitaker | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that the defendant might answer the promises and that an account might be taken what was due to the complainant for principal and interest upon his security, and also in respect of costs of the suit in the Exchequer... |
| C78/2114, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2114/IMG_0730.htm] | | C78/2114, no. 18 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2114/IMG_0730.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
| | | | ||
| John English v. William Walker Jenkins | | John English v. William Walker Jenkins | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that might be declared that no partnership between the complainant and the defendant existed, or ever did exist under the agreement of 23 July 1840... but in case your Lordship should be of the opinion that any partnership existed, then it might be decreed to be immediately dissolved. |
| C78/2119, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2119/IMG_0058.htm] | | C78/2119, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2119/IMG_0058.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
| | | | ||
| Joseph Adnett the elder and Joseph Adnett the younger on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of Edward Thompson deceased v. Beulah Thompson widow and Alice Thompson | | Joseph Adnett the elder and Joseph Adnett the younger on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of Edward Thompson deceased v. Beulah Thompson widow and Alice Thompson | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that a account taken of what was due to the complt. Joseph Adnett the elder, for principal and interest on his mortgage debt and for costs paid by the complt. to the Banking Company... |
| C78/2117, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2117/IMG_0170.htm] | | C78/2117, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2117/IMG_0170.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
| | | | ||
| William Ranger v. Great Western Railway Company, Robert Bright, Peter Maze, Henry Bush, James Cordy, Richard Ranger, and George Ranger | | William Ranger v. Great Western Railway Company, Robert Bright, Peter Maze, Henry Bush, James Cordy, Richard Ranger, and George Ranger | ||
− | | Concerning the contractual discretion of Isambard Kingdom Brunel in the construction of the rail lines | + | | re. praying that it might be declared that the complainant was imposed upon, deceived and defrauded in respect of the strata through which the tunnels and cuttings in the contract of I.B. were to be made and was entitled to be relieved in regard thereto, from the contract sum £63,028 and 16 shillings [Concerning the contractual discretion of Isambard Kingdom Brunel in the construction of the rail lines]. |
| C78/2116, no. 6 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2116/IMG_0991.htm] | | C78/2116, no. 6 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2116/IMG_0991.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| George Hawkins v. Henry Arthur Woodgate clerk; Richard Harding; and William Woodgate | | George Hawkins v. Henry Arthur Woodgate clerk; Richard Harding; and William Woodgate | ||
− | | | + | | [faded document] re. praying that on payment by the complainant to the defendants of the sums of £2,500 and £79-5s-7d, the said defendant might be entitled to for the repurchase of the annuity £215-6s-2d... |
| C79/341, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no341/IMG_0109.htm] | | C79/341, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C79no341/IMG_0109.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
| | | | ||
| Elizabeth Bentley v. Charles Smart | | Elizabeth Bentley v. Charles Smart | ||
− | | | + | | [''vide'' C78/2122, no. 7, above] re. orders concerning partnership in Phoenix Foundry, Dorrington Street, Clerkenwell; Thomas Rolton and Charles Smart, partners. |
| C78/2122, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2122/IMG_0369.htm] | | C78/2122, no. 8 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2122/IMG_0369.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 276: | Line 276: | ||
| | | | ||
| Thomas Dyson and Edgar Taylor v. Thomas Brooke Morris, Henry Brown, Mary Ann Brown, and Thomas Lombe Taylor | | Thomas Dyson and Edgar Taylor v. Thomas Brooke Morris, Henry Brown, Mary Ann Brown, and Thomas Lombe Taylor | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that an account of what was due to the complainant Thomas Dyson for principal and interest, upon the security of the premises mentioned, and that the said Thomas Brooke Morris be decreed to pay to the complainant what should appear to be due on that account. |
| C78/2124, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2124/IMG_0065.htm] | | C78/2124, no. 10 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2124/IMG_0065.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 285: | Line 285: | ||
| | | | ||
| Patrick McGregor & Cordelia his wife v. Thomas Topham & Eliza Henrietta his wife, Joseph Arrowsmith, and John Topham | | Patrick McGregor & Cordelia his wife v. Thomas Topham & Eliza Henrietta his wife, Joseph Arrowsmith, and John Topham | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that it might be declared that upon the decease of Richard Wrightson [of Cockerton House, Durham], the copyhold hereditaments and premises to which he was equitably and absolutely seized, descended to the complainant Cordelia McGregor (sister of Richard Wrightson) as sole heiress, according to the custom of the manor. |
| C78/2126, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2126/IMG_0329.htm] | | C78/2126, no. 7 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2126/IMG_0329.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
| | | | ||
| Thomas William Forbes and Joseph Hartley v. Isaac Lawrence & Mary his wife, William Henry Lawrence, Isaac Lawrence the younger, Frederick Lawrence, Charles Lawrence, George Lawrence, William Augustus Wilson & Mary his wife, Augusta Mary Wilson, Barkly Charles Wilson, George Upton, Dorothy Abbotson, John Evrerett, Martin Newton, Thomas Stackhouse Burton, and Harriet Lawrence widow, and James Fisher | | Thomas William Forbes and Joseph Hartley v. Isaac Lawrence & Mary his wife, William Henry Lawrence, Isaac Lawrence the younger, Frederick Lawrence, Charles Lawrence, George Lawrence, William Augustus Wilson & Mary his wife, Augusta Mary Wilson, Barkly Charles Wilson, George Upton, Dorothy Abbotson, John Evrerett, Martin Newton, Thomas Stackhouse Burton, and Harriet Lawrence widow, and James Fisher | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that it might be declared whether the £10,000 legacy given by the codicil was, or was not, intended by testator John Lawrence as a satisfaction for the legacy, or... |
| C78/2119, no. 11 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2119/IMG_0066.htm] | | C78/2119, no. 11 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2119/IMG_0066.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
| | | | ||
| Robert Wainwright Ashley and William Ashley, executors of Francis Ashley v. Thomas Alison Hoskins, James Ottery Watson, Ambrose Lace, and John North | | Robert Wainwright Ashley and William Ashley, executors of Francis Ashley v. Thomas Alison Hoskins, James Ottery Watson, Ambrose Lace, and John North | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that the award might be specifically performed in respect of the several matters mentioned, in which the same remained un-performed, as against the said defendants Thomas Alison Hoskins and James Otley Watson & it might be declared that the complainants were entitled under the award to receive the sum of £1,935 16s 4d... |
| C78/2122, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2122/IMG_0371.htm] | | C78/2122, no. 9 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2122/IMG_0371.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 313: | Line 313: | ||
| | | | ||
| David Lyon v. Andrew Colvile, Alexander Seton, John Kellerman Wedderburn, John Wedderburn, John Walter Wedderburn, Mary Wisdom Wedderburn, John Watson, and William Lyon | | David Lyon v. Andrew Colvile, Alexander Seton, John Kellerman Wedderburn, John Wedderburn, John Walter Wedderburn, Mary Wisdom Wedderburn, John Watson, and William Lyon | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that it might be referred to one of the Masters of the Court to take an account of what was due for principal and interest in respect of £42,650 1s advanced by the complainant to James Wedderburn the younger... |
| C78/2120, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2120/IMG_0119.htm] | | C78/2120, no. 5 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2120/IMG_0119.htm] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 323: | Line 323: | ||
| | | | ||
| Charles Barrow Evans an infant by John Blagdon his next friend v. Richard Ashley Scott, Harriet Brockhurst, Hillary Anne Brockhurst, Henry Barrow Evans, Edmund Barrow Evans, and Maria Augusta Evans | | Charles Barrow Evans an infant by John Blagdon his next friend v. Richard Ashley Scott, Harriet Brockhurst, Hillary Anne Brockhurst, Henry Barrow Evans, Edmund Barrow Evans, and Maria Augusta Evans | ||
− | | | + | | re. praying that it might be declared that the indenture of mortgage 10 March 1842 was unduly obtained and executed for securing the sum of £8,000... |
| C78/2124, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2124/IMG_0107.htm] | | C78/2124, no. 15 [http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/C78/C78no2124/IMG_0107.htm] | ||
|- | |- |
Latest revision as of 06:57, 12 November 2018
Overall C78 page [1] Major Contributor(s): Robert C. Palmer Minor Contributors please initial relevant rows |
Cal_Year | Cal_Date | Regnal_Year | Parties | Subject Matter | Roll/Case_No. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1844 | C78/, no. [] | |||||
1844 | 11 Jan | Henry Pinkus v The Ratcliff Gas Light and Coke Company, Hercules Paynter, George Offor, John George Hammack, Jesse Cullum, John Bromley, John Sander, Thomas Simpson and Amelia Petch | re. praying that the complt. might have the benefit of the said bill of complaint as a supplemental bill against the said Hercules Paynter, and as an original bill to the several other defendants, and that it might be declared that the defendants were liable to make good to the complt. the 500 shares in the East London Gas-Light Company. | C78/2114, no. 9 [2] | ||
1844 | 11 Jan | John Saville Hallifax v. Jeremiah Hart the elder, Jeremiah Hart the younger, William Hart, and James Hart | re. praying that an account might be taken of what was due and owing to the complainant for principal and interest by virtue of his mortgage & securities and that the defendants might be decreed to pay to the complainant what should be found due. | C78/2120, no. 4 [3] | ||
1844 | 15 Jan | Charles Frederick William Augustus, Duke of Brunswick v. Ernest Augustus, duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale and earl of Armagh, King of Hanover | re. praying that it might be declared that the instrument in writing on the 6 Feb and 14 Mar 1833 and the appointment of the Duke of Cambridge as guardian of the fortune and property of the plaintiff were absolutely void and of no effect ... | C78/2122, no. 6 [4] | ||
1844 | 22 Feb | James Man (since deceased) and George Lackington (assignees of John Bourke Ricketts a bankrupt) v. Thomas Bourke Ricketts and Robert Fitzwilliam Hallifax (since deceased), John Bourke Ricketts, William Anderson, and Louisa Frances Ricketts | re. praying that the will of George Crawford Ricketts might be declared well proved & might be established and that the trusts thereof, so far as regards the estate in Shropshire [in par. Ashford Bowdler] devised by the will, be decreed to be carried into execution etc... | C78/2114, no. 10 [5] | ||
1844 | 24 Feb | Richard James Allen v. Joseph Videan & Emma Bedford his wife, Sarah Hill, and John Rice | re. praying that the defendants might answer the premises & that an account might be taken of what was due to the complt. as surviving executor and trustee of the will and codicil of Eleanora Cavell in respect of the mortgage debt of £1,400, and that Joseph Videan and Emma Bedford might pay such amount to the complainant etc... | C78/2114, no. 11 [6] | ||
1844 | 24 Feb | William Boughton v. John James the elder, John James the younger, Reverend John Prosser & Elizabeth his wife, and Elizabeth Frances Prosser, and William Henry Prosser infants, Henry Kear Whithorne (called Henry Ker Whithorne) & Susanna his wife (called Susan), Caroline Wintle, Alicia Joyce Boughton, John Boughton, and Jane Boughton infants, William Boughton, John Henry Boughton, Frederick Wintle Boughton, and Edward Vaughan Boughton infants, and Lucy Scott Boughton, Mary Jane Boughton, Elizabeth Johnes Boughton, and Ellen Young Boughton infants | re. praying that it might be declared that the trusts declared by the will [1 July 1831] of the testator [Revd. William Boughton, d. 1831] concerning his real and personal estates devised and bequeathed, and the surplus rents, issues & profits... were void, as being too remote...[daughters of a nephew born after testator's death]. | C78/2123, no. 16 [7] | ||
1844 | 1 March | Attorney General by the relation of Frederic Engler, John Stulz, and Samuel Housley v. Edward Henry Rickards, Samuel Walker, and Arthur Annesley out of the jurisdiction | re. praying that the Attorney General might have the benefit in equity of the Judgement of Outlawry and of the writ of capias ut legatum [writ for the arrest of an outlaw] issued and that the indenture or deed of trust might be declared fraudulent, void or of none effect has against the right or title of Her Majesty under and by virtue of the said outlawryand that all the estate and interests belonging to the defendant Arthur Annesley... | C78/2114, no. 12 [8] | ||
1844 | 1 March | William Fry Milroy v. Andrew Haigh Milroy, Alexander Milroy, John Dean & Mary Penelope his wife, James Amos Kelly, James Reynolds, Frederic John Reed, Mary Milroy Dean, Sarah Elizabeth Dean, John Thomas Dean, Sarah Laura milroy, and William Fry | re. praying that the rights and interests of all parties under the will of the testator John Fry in his freehold and leasehold estates and in the rents and profits thereof which have not been divided, might be declared, and that the trusts be performed and carried into execution... | C78/2121, no. 3 [9] | ||
1844 | 16 March | William Robert Paris v. George Hughes, Matthew Ward, Thomas Tebbutt the elder, Thomas Tebbutt the younger, John Tebbutt, William Brightmore, and Richard Undy | re. praying that the indenture of mortgage, the indenture executed by the complainant in prison and also the conveyance to the said William Brightmore and from him to Richard Undy might be declared fraudulent and void, and that it might be set aside and that an account might be taken how what was due and owing from the complainant to the said Thomas Hughes & George Hughes... | C78/2114, no. 13 [10] | ||
1844 | 16 March | Thomas Wardale, John Wardale, Joseph Wardale, and Robert Wardale, all infants by John Wardale their father v. Lewis Weston, Jarvis, Robert Coe the younger, and Thomas Wardale | re. praying the will of the testator might be established and the trusts thereof declared and carried into execution and that an account might be taken of the personal estate and effects possessed or received by the defndts., Lewis Weston Jarvis & Robert Coe. | C78/2121, no. 4 [11] | ||
1844 | 16 March | 7 | Edward Thomas Foley v. Thomas Hill; Thomas Bate; and William Robins | re.praying that an account might be taken of the sum of £6,117-10 shillings and of all other, the sums of money received by the firm of Hill and Company for the use of the complainant since 11 April 1829, with interest. | C79/341, no. 6 [12] | |
1844 | 25 March | Benjamin Hope v. Henry Payne Hope | re. praying that the defendant might be decreed to perform the agreement of the 10 August last, the complaining thereby offering in every respect the same on his part, and that the defendant might be restrained by injunction of the Court from taking any further proceedings to enforce the same... and if the Sheriff of the county of Somerset has sold the goods and chattels of the complainant, then the proceeds might be ordered to be paid into the Court in trust. | C78/2119, no. 6 [13] | ||
1844 | 25 March | Elizabeth Bentley widow v. Charles Smart | re. Praying that an account might be taken of the personal estate of Thomas Rolton which was engaged in the trade or business at the time at which he took the defendant into co-partnership [Weir and Co.] and that an account might also be taken of the dealings and transactions of the co-partnership down to the time of the said Thomas Rolton's death. | C78/2122, no. 7 [14] | ||
1844 | 2 April | Ann Farmer v James Farmer | re. praying that the several indentures of lease and release and assignment of 28/29 September 1827 executed by John Jones and Elizabeth Jones might be cancelled and declared fraudulent and the defendant might be decreed to convey the moiety of the estates called Billslands and Hill Farm unto complt... | C78/2119, no. 7 [15] | ||
1844 | 17 April | Sir Charles Merrik Burrell baronet [1774–1862] v. George Wyndham esq | re. praying that an account might be taken of the principal and interest owing to the complts. as executors of George O'Brien late Earl of Egremont [George O'Brien Wyndham, 3rd Earl of Egremont, 1751-1837] in respect of the sum of £25,000 charged upon the premises in Somerset, Dorset and Cornwall... | C78/2114, no. 14 [16] | ||
1844 | 22 April | William Henry, lord viscount Downe v. James Morris and John Robertson | Whether or not certain premises, which had been mortgaged by William Arrowsmith now decd, were held of the Manor of Danby, otherwise Danby, Lealholme and Glazedale, Yorks. | C78/2119, no. 8 [17] | ||
1844 | 23 April | 7 | James Farmer v. Ann Farmer | re. praying that the indenture of release 29 September 1827 whereby Elizabeth Jones conveyed to the complt. the reversion in fee of one moiety of the estate called Hill Farm might be established... | C79/341, no. 7 [18] | |
1844 | 29 May | William Oliver Cramer, Mary Anne Jane Cramer, and Pennington Cramer infants by Charles Norton next friend v. Sarah Pennington who afterwards became the wife of John Haskins, Jane Pennington, William Cramer, Richard Jennings, Thomas Farrance, and John Morris Fisher | re. praying that the rights and interests of all parties in and to the sum of £2,000 3% consolidated Bank Annuities standing in the names of Richard Jennings, Thomas Farrance and John Morris Fisher might be ascertained... | C78/2114, no. 15 [19] | ||
1844 | 29 May | Frederick Squire, Richard King, Meade King, and John Squire v. Mary Phillippa Whitton and William Morgan | re. praying that the said defendants might make a full and fair discovery of all and singular, and that it might be declared by the decree of the court that the defendant Mary Philippa Whitton and William Morgan were liable to pay to the complt. as such executors, the sum of £10,000 with interest... | C78/2114, no. 16 [20] | ||
1844 | 10 June | Richard Tanfield v. Samuel Sturgis, Edmund French, and Richard Kirkman Lane | re. praying that an account of what was due and owing to the complainant for principal and interest on his mortgage and of all costs an expenses incurred by the complainant... | C78/2114, no. 17 [21] | ||
1844 | 12 June | Richard Bottomley Nowell v. George Whitaker | re. praying that the defendant might answer the promises and that an account might be taken what was due to the complainant for principal and interest upon his security, and also in respect of costs of the suit in the Exchequer... | C78/2114, no. 18 [22] | ||
1844 | 28 June | John English v. William Walker Jenkins | re. praying that might be declared that no partnership between the complainant and the defendant existed, or ever did exist under the agreement of 23 July 1840... but in case your Lordship should be of the opinion that any partnership existed, then it might be decreed to be immediately dissolved. | C78/2119, no. 9 [23] | ||
1844 | 12 July | Joseph Adnett the elder and Joseph Adnett the younger on behalf of themselves and all other creditors of Edward Thompson deceased v. Beulah Thompson widow and Alice Thompson | re. praying that a account taken of what was due to the complt. Joseph Adnett the elder, for principal and interest on his mortgage debt and for costs paid by the complt. to the Banking Company... | C78/2117, no. 5 [24] | ||
1844 | 13 July | William Ranger v. Great Western Railway Company, Robert Bright, Peter Maze, Henry Bush, James Cordy, Richard Ranger, and George Ranger | re. praying that it might be declared that the complainant was imposed upon, deceived and defrauded in respect of the strata through which the tunnels and cuttings in the contract of I.B. were to be made and was entitled to be relieved in regard thereto, from the contract sum £63,028 and 16 shillings [Concerning the contractual discretion of Isambard Kingdom Brunel in the construction of the rail lines]. | C78/2116, no. 6 [25] | ||
1844 | 18 July | 8 | George Hawkins v. Henry Arthur Woodgate clerk; Richard Harding; and William Woodgate | [faded document] re. praying that on payment by the complainant to the defendants of the sums of £2,500 and £79-5s-7d, the said defendant might be entitled to for the repurchase of the annuity £215-6s-2d... | C79/341, no. 8 [26] | |
1844 | 4 Nov | Elizabeth Bentley v. Charles Smart | [vide C78/2122, no. 7, above] re. orders concerning partnership in Phoenix Foundry, Dorrington Street, Clerkenwell; Thomas Rolton and Charles Smart, partners. | C78/2122, no. 8 [27] | ||
1844 | 7 Nov | Thomas Dyson and Edgar Taylor v. Thomas Brooke Morris, Henry Brown, Mary Ann Brown, and Thomas Lombe Taylor | re. praying that an account of what was due to the complainant Thomas Dyson for principal and interest, upon the security of the premises mentioned, and that the said Thomas Brooke Morris be decreed to pay to the complainant what should appear to be due on that account. | C78/2124, no. 10 [28] | ||
1844 | 11 Nov | Patrick McGregor & Cordelia his wife v. Thomas Topham & Eliza Henrietta his wife, Joseph Arrowsmith, and John Topham | re. praying that it might be declared that upon the decease of Richard Wrightson [of Cockerton House, Durham], the copyhold hereditaments and premises to which he was equitably and absolutely seized, descended to the complainant Cordelia McGregor (sister of Richard Wrightson) as sole heiress, according to the custom of the manor. | C78/2126, no. 7 [29] | ||
1844 | 22 Nov | Thomas William Forbes and Joseph Hartley v. Isaac Lawrence & Mary his wife, William Henry Lawrence, Isaac Lawrence the younger, Frederick Lawrence, Charles Lawrence, George Lawrence, William Augustus Wilson & Mary his wife, Augusta Mary Wilson, Barkly Charles Wilson, George Upton, Dorothy Abbotson, John Evrerett, Martin Newton, Thomas Stackhouse Burton, and Harriet Lawrence widow, and James Fisher | re. praying that it might be declared whether the £10,000 legacy given by the codicil was, or was not, intended by testator John Lawrence as a satisfaction for the legacy, or... | C78/2119, no. 11 [30] | ||
1844 | 11 Dec | Robert Wainwright Ashley and William Ashley, executors of Francis Ashley v. Thomas Alison Hoskins, James Ottery Watson, Ambrose Lace, and John North | re. praying that the award might be specifically performed in respect of the several matters mentioned, in which the same remained un-performed, as against the said defendants Thomas Alison Hoskins and James Otley Watson & it might be declared that the complainants were entitled under the award to receive the sum of £1,935 16s 4d... | C78/2122, no. 9 [31] | ||
1844 | 19 Dec | David Lyon v. Andrew Colvile, Alexander Seton, John Kellerman Wedderburn, John Wedderburn, John Walter Wedderburn, Mary Wisdom Wedderburn, John Watson, and William Lyon | re. praying that it might be referred to one of the Masters of the Court to take an account of what was due for principal and interest in respect of £42,650 1s advanced by the complainant to James Wedderburn the younger... | C78/2120, no. 5 [32] | ||
1844 | 21 Dec | Charles Barrow Evans an infant by John Blagdon his next friend v. Richard Ashley Scott, Harriet Brockhurst, Hillary Anne Brockhurst, Henry Barrow Evans, Edmund Barrow Evans, and Maria Augusta Evans | re. praying that it might be declared that the indenture of mortgage 10 March 1842 was unduly obtained and executed for securing the sum of £8,000... | C78/2124, no. 15 [33] | ||
1844 | C78/, no. [] |