STAC Tooker

From Waalt

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Toker, Augustine

  • STAC 5/T20/36 - B Dr - 33 Eliz - Cornwall - Augustine Toker v John Skowen

Tooker, John

  • STAC 5/T13/10 - B - 37 Eliz - - John Toker v Nicoll Ford, John Ford

Tooker, John

  • STAC 5/T24/34 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - - John Tooker v Thomas Tooker, John Maunder et al
  • STAC 5/T32/4 - Rn - 39 Eliz - - John Toker v Thomas Toker, John Maunder

Toker, Florence

  • STAC 5/T25/35 - B - - - Florence Tooker, Richard Tooker v William Jope
  • STAC 5/T22/28 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Florence Toker, Richard Toker v William Jope

Tooker, Thomas

  • STAC 5/T23/7 - B A Rn - 21 Eliz - - Thomas Tooker v William Symkins, John Crosby
  • STAC 5/T6/27 - I D - 22 Eliz - - Thomas Tooker v John Crosbye, William Simpkins

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 36r. Defendant never served with process ordered to answer by dedimus potestatem if the plaintiff would require it. Tooker, plaintiff; Atwill et al: Ordered to take the answers and examinations of defendants some served and some never served with process the court ordered that to be received for the defendants that were never served with process who had not returned their answers, if the plaintiff would require the same. Michaelmas 22 Elizabeth (kk)
  • Tucker v Anthony - STAC 7/7/18 see STAC Tucker
  • Tucker v Brackley - STAC 5/T28/29 see STAC Tucker
  • Tucker v Collins - STAC 5/T26/8 see STAC Tucker
  • Tucker v Compton - STAC 5/T35/14, STAC 5/T1/32, STAC 5/T21/8 see STAC Tucker
  • Tucker v Proctor - STAC 5/T4/27 see STAC Tucker
  • Tucker v Tucker - STAC 5/T24/28 see STAC Tucker