STAC Richardson
From Waalt
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Richardson, Anthony
- STAC 5/R8/32 - B A Rn - 31 Eliz - - Antony Richardson v Meredith Hanmer, Thomas Gallant
- STAC 5/R34/15 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Antony Richardson v Meredith Hanmer et al
- STAC 5/R10/13 - Rn - 31 Eliz - - Antony Richardson v Meredith Hanmer, Thomas Gallante et al
- STAC 5/R39/32 - I D - 32 Eliz - - [blank] Richardson v Thomas Gallante, Henry Lacye et al
Richardson, Christopher
- STAC 5/R28/36 - B A - 30 Eliz - - Cristopher Richardson v Robert Darneton, Turrner alias Sadler et al
- STAC 5/R30/7 - I D - 30 Eliz - - Christopher Richardson v John Darneton Jr, Robert Darneton
- probably see STAC Darneton STAC 5/D9/19 John Darneton v John Barnes, Christopher Richardson
Richardson, David
- STAC 5/R23/30 - B - 36 Eliz - Montgomery - David Richardson v Griffith ap Humphry, Lloyd Griffith et al
Richardson, Edward
- STAC 5/R30/31 - B A - 41 Eliz - - Edward Richardson, Daniel Richardson v Daniel Bannister, Thomas Bannister
- STAC 5/R40/23 - Rn - 42 Eliz - - Edward Richardson, Daniel Richardson v Daniel Banyster, Thomas Banyster
- STAC 5/R27/4 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Edward Richardson, Daniel Richardson v Daniel Bannister, Thomas Bannister
Richardson, James
- STAC 5/R29/1 - B Dr A - 27 Eliz - - James Richardson, Clemence Richardson, Symon Jeffery v Sir Charles Framingham, John
- STAC 5/R40/35 - Rn - - - James Richardson v Sir James Framlingham et al
Richardson, John
- STAC 5/R8/23 - B A Rn - 17 Eliz - - John Richardson v [blank] Wilkynson, Nicholas Martin et al
- STAC 5/R36/30 - I D - 17 Eliz - - John Richardson v Thomas Reddall, Edward Wilkinson et al
Richardson, John
- STAC 5/R11/15 - B A C - 39 Eliz - - John Richardson alias Slater v Antony Chater, Bernard Dodds et al
Richardson, John
- STAC 5/R1/34 - B - 40 Eliz - Cumberland - John Richardson v John Miles, Richard Wilkinson, Edward Wilkinson, Alice Wilson et al
Richardson, Oliver
- STAC 5/R38/13 - B A - 28 Eliz - - Olyver Richardson v John Phillips
- STAC 5/R37/28 - B A - 29 Eliz - - Olyver Richardson v John Phillips
- STAC 5/R42/26 - Rr - - - Olyver Richardson v John Phillips
- STAC 5/R39/37 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Olyver Richardson v John Phillippes
- STAC 5/R29/24 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Olyver Richardson v John Phillipps
- STAC 5/R7/7 - I D - 28 Eliz - - Oliver Richardson v John Philips
- STAC 7/28/10 - - - - Oliver Richardson v John Phillippes
Richardson, Robert
- STAC 5/R24/37 - B A - 30 Eliz - - Robert Richardson v Thomas Saville
Richardson, Thomas
- STAC 5/R14/2 - B - 17 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v John Carter et uxor
Richardson, Thomas
- STAC 5/R39/4 - B - 39 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v Robert Machin, Robert Claxton et al
Richardson, Thomas
- STAC 5/R25/39 - B A Dr - 40 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v Conon Richardson, John Travis
- STAC 5/R9/15 - I D - 40 Eliz - - Thomas Richardson v John Trevys
Richardson, William
- STAC 5/R42/33 - Rn - - - William Richardson alias Cragge v John Fearon, John Spencer et al
Richardson, William
- STAC 5/R22/1 - B A - 24 Eliz - - William Richardson v Nicholas Wychenden alias Roswell, Alexander Ridgewaies
Richardson, William
- STAC 5/R2/34 - B A C I D - Trin 42 Eliz - - William Richardson v Edmund Harewell, Thomas Tuffley, George Sole, Thomas Southam alias Southorn et al
- STAC 5/R13/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - - William Richardson v Edmund Harewell, Thomas Tuffley et al
- STAC 5/R7/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - - William Richardson v Edmund Farewell, George Sowle et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A30/12 - Rn - 41 Eliz - - AG v John Richardson
- STAC 5/A26/25 - I D - 42 Eliz - - AG v John Richardson
- STAC 5/A54/24 - I D - 41 Eliz - - AG v John Richardson
Almoner
- STAC 5/A19 /2 - B - 7 Eliz - - Almoner v Thomas Richardson, Peter Dod et al
Almoner
- STAC 5/A4/34 - B - 32 Eliz - Suffolk - Almoner v James Richardson et uxor
- see STAC co Suffolk
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 65v. Costs to one defendant who releaseth the plaintiff the other defendant to take his remedy against his fellow defendant by writ of contributions as is usual. Richardson et al, plaintiffs; Allen and Brown, defendants: the whole costs were paid to Allen and a release thereupon made, the defendant Brown did nevertheless sue out process of counterpart and referred the said Brown to take his ordinary remedy against the other defendant for his portion vizt a writ of contribution. Easter 38 Elizabeth (kk)