The University of Houston is developing a long-term plan aimed
at enhancing student learning, and would like input from the
campus community to determine how to best focus its efforts.
UH is in the process of creating a quality enhancement plan
(QEP) as part of the reaffirmation of its accreditation by the
Commission on Colleges of the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). This process
requires UH to create and to submit a comprehensive compliance
certification document and a QEP plan centered on a single academic
topic by fall 2007.
Three proposed QEP topics recently were developed by a committee
consisting of faculty, staff and students, all with expertise
in undergraduate education. This group was led by Elaine Charlson,
executive associate vice president for academic and faculty
affairs. The topics are: undergraduate research, student mentoring
and a disciplinary approach to student writing.
Concept papers detailing these topics’ goals and potential
impact on student learning are available online on the SACS
Web site (http://www.sacs.uh.edu/qep_info.htm).
After reviewing these papers, the university community is encouraged
to offer feedback online regarding the proposed topics or suggest
possible other directions for the QEP by submitting comments
using this site’s online survey. (link to www.sacs.uh.edu/qepsurvey/)
“The more input we receive the better the topic selection
will be,” said Chris Stanich, UH executive director for
planning and policy. “Everyone will have different perspectives
on these topics. Gathering input from faculty, staff and students
will put us in the best position to not only choose the right
topic but to develop an effective plan.”
A topic will be selected by late February or early March and
then will be presented to the UH SACS Leadership Committee for
approval, Stanich said. Once the topic is approved, another
committee will be assigned to develop the actual QEP, which
will be completed by December 2007.
The committee responsible for identifying topics began brainstorming
in September, and throughout the fall 2006 semester, its members
gathered input from different areas of the university.
“The committee’s charge was to use their own expertise
and solicit input from colleagues for a QEP topic,” Stanich
said. “The QEP itself will be a long-term plan that deals
with an aspect of student learning such as the topics that have
been presented. SACS expects the university to design, implement
and evaluate the plan in terms of its impact on student learning.”
UH began its reaffirmation process in fall 2006 by conducting
an analysis of the breadth of the university, including governance
and administration, financial stability, faculty credentials,
academic programs and policies, library and other learning resources,
student support services and facilities.
SACS accredits institutions
of higher education throughout the 11 southern states and parts
of Latin America. Accreditation indicates that an institution
maintains clearly specified educational objectives that are
consistent with its mission and appropriate to the degrees it
offers, and that it is successful in achieving those objectives.
To gain or maintain accreditation, an institution must comply
with SACS principles of quality enhancement, policies and procedures.
Mike Emery
memery@central.uh.edu